Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 146985

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : ZC19 - ZC23 Full Version

Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers to Dental Treatment of Mothers Regarding Early Childhood Caries: A Cross-sectional Survey from Taif Province, Saudi Arabia


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67869.18891
Fatam Salem Alzahrani

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Correspondence Address :
Fatam Salem Alzahrani,
Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: fatmasalzahrani@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Early Childhood Caries (ECC), also called ‘baby bottle tooth decay’ or ‘early childhood tooth decay,’ significantly affects infants and children aged six or younger, causing cavities and with lasting impacts on oral health and overall well-being. Its global prevalence concerns healthcare professionals and policymakers due to its multifactorial nature, influenced by diet, oral hygiene, socio-economic factors, and maternal awareness. Mothers, as primary caregivers during early childhood, play a crucial role in ECC prevention and early intervention.

Aim: This study examines mothers’ knowledge and attitude regarding ECC and risk factors associated with children’s dental health, to determine difficulties in dental therapy in Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey design in the province of Taif, Saudi Arabia, a random sample of 288 mothers of healthy children aged three to seven years were surveyed. A structured questionnaire containing 26 close ended questions was used to gather information regarding the socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge and attitude of the mothers regarding ECC, as well as barriers to dental care. The questionnaire was originally drafted in English and then translated into Arabic by a professional translator. Using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, an analysis and a representation of data was performed.

Results: More than half of the mothers 57.63% (n=166) understood the relation between poor dental health and hygiene and a child’s ability to learn, and 20.13% (n=58) didn’t know if poor dental health can impair a child’s ability to learn (p=0.02). The notion that a visit to the dentist should begin within six months of the appearance of milk teeth was agreed with by 55.55% (n=160) of the mothers, while 28.81% (n=83) of them didn’t know the proper time for a child’s first visit to the dentist (p=0.03). Only 22.22% of the mothers didn’t know what the nearest dental center to them was.

Conclusion: The present study revealed that mothers did have awareness of different aspects of oral health and dental caries, several mothers exhibited unfavorable attitudes toward oral health practices, which could set a negative example for their children.

Keywords

Dental therapy, Maternal knowledge, Oral health

Oral health is a vital part of human well-being, and must be consistently maintained throughout an individual’s lifespan (1). A child’s oral health has a significant impact on their life, and is essential to overall health. One of the most prevalent issues with oral health worldwide is dental caries. Dental caries rates used to be low in most developing countries, but they are currently on the rise (2). ECC refers to the loss or the repair of one or more primary teeth in children less than 71-month-old (3),(4). It is reported that up to 90% of children worldwide are afflicted with the ECC, with those from low-income countries and marginalised populations being the most impacted (2),(5). Cariogenic bacteria, carbohydrates, dietary habits, and social and economic position all influence ECC’s development, making it a disease with several causes (3). In the short and long-term, children with ECC experience severe pain that often affects their common everyday activities, such as eating, sleeping, learning, and speaking (5),(6).

Effective strategies for avoiding ECC include anticipatory advice, nutritional counseling, parental education on eating patterns that increase tooth decay, constant oral hygiene, and the use of fluoride. It is also recommended that a child has a dental check-up before they reach one year in age (7).

Infants and toddlers depend entirely on their parents, and studies find that mothers’ education considerably influences children’s oral health (8),(9). Therefore, the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (AAPD) advocates for the creation of a dental home during the first six months after the emergence of the first tooth and educates parents on the prevention of oral cavity illnesses (7). It has been shown that children adopt their eating habits, feeding preferences, and lifestyles from their mothers (8).

Although studies have explored the knowledge and attitudes of mothers concerning ECC, a comprehensive understanding regarding the depth of Saudi’s mothers’ knowledge, the accuracy of their beliefs, and their comprehension of the risk factors and preventive measures associated with ECC remains incomplete (4),(10),(11),(12). Therefore, this study investigated the knowledge and attitudes, of mothers of children aged three to seven years in the Taif province, Saudi Arabia, about ECC. To do so, a cross-sectional survey was designed for the collection of data from mothers of healthy children.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data on the mothers’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding ECC and risk factors and obstacles to dental therapy in Taif, Saudi Arabia. The study period was July 2022 to September 2022. This study is approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University. (Approval number: 1-439-6097 Taif University.) Written informed consent was collected from the participants before data collection. Individual data was completely anonymised after data collection. The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring voluntary and anonymous participation.

Inclusion criteria: mothers of healthy children (i.e., children with no medical problems) aged 3 to 7 years with tooth decay in multiple teeth. They also had to speak Arabic and be living in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Consent to participation was obtained from all the mothers prior to them answering the survey (a Google Form).

Exclusion criteria: Mothers who did not give the consent were excluded from the study.

Sample size: A pilot study with a sample size of 25 was carried out. The factor loading for maternal knowledge was 0.81, maternal attitude was 0.85, and maternal belief was 0.87. Based on the pilot study’s results, the sample size sample of 288 was determined. This was rounded to 315 to compensate for non-response bias (10%). However, 27 mothers either did not give consent (8) or did not complete the survey (19). Hence, the final sample size was 288.

Procedure

Questionnaire: Using a descriptive quantitative approach, a well-structured self-developed questionnaire consisting of 26 questions and based on review literature was made on Google Forms (4),(10),(11),(12) The questionnaire was originally drafted in English and then translated into Arabic by a professional translator. The questionnaire followed the dichotomous scale. The researcher collected data on the mothers’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding ECC, as well as obstacles to dental therapy. The demographic data of the participants was also included in the study.

The questionnaire was piloted among a non-target sample of 25 mothers. No changes were made to the original questionnaire. The participant mothers completed the survey on Google Forms. The internal consistency of the questionnaire sub-scales was computed using Cronbach’s Alpha formula and exploratory factor analysis, to evaluate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. The results showed reliability, with a value of 0.830.

The questionnaire had four sections:

• Socio-demographic characteristics of mother and children
• The mother’s knowledge, attitude, and thoughts regarding ECC. This section was composed of 13 closed-ended questions. The answers to these questions were “Yes”, “No”, and “I don’t know”. The mother’s knowledge was measured by a calculation of the percentage of the correct answers, the score for the mothers’ answers was written in percentage which represents the oral health knowledge for each respondent.
• Obstacles to dental therapy. This section included four closed-ended questions.
• The sources from which the mother had acquired her knowledge about oral care and health. This was a single question.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22.0. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics, comparisons of means. Chi-square test of proportion was used and the probability values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Intra-examiner reliability was also calculated using the kappa score, and was found to equal 0.738. In addition, factor loading for all the remaining items was 0.83.

Results

Most of the mothers were aged between 35 and 39 years, 37.84% (n=109). Only 14.58% (n=42) were aged 25-29 years. Regarding educational status, 59.02% (n=170) of mothers had a bachelor’s degree, and 24.30% (n=70) had a high school. A 52.08% (n=150) of the children were female, and the 33.68% (n=97) of the children were between zero to three years and 66.31% (n=191) were between four to seven years. A 163 (56.59%) mothers were housewives (Table/Fig 1).

A 77.08% (n=222), of the mothers understood that tooth decay is the most common chronic childhood disease among children under seven years of age, and almost all the mothers 94.79% (n=273) agreed that a child’s teeth are as important as an adult’s teeth. When asked about breastfeeding and its relation to dental caries, 59.72% (n=172) of the mothers believed there was no relation, and that breastfeeding does not cause caries. Only 20.83% (n=60) believed there was a relation (Table/Fig 2).

A 70.48% (n=203) of the mothers didn’t see a problem with children sharing food and food utensils. Most of the mothers, 88.19% (n=254) knew that a child’s toothbrush should be changed every three months. The notion that a visit to the dentist should begin within six months of the appearance of milk teeth was agreed with by almost 78.12% (n=225) of the mothers didn’t take much care of their children’s baby teeth, “because they will fall out” (Table/Fig 3).

A 23.95% (n=69) of the children had never visited a dentist, even though the nearest dental center was less than one hour away for about 90.62% (n=261) of the families. Regarding dental insurance, 64.23% (n=185) of the children had dental insurance, compared to 29.51% (n=85) who didn’t (Table/Fig 4).

A 79.16% (n=228) of the mothers surveyed obtained their knowledge from dentists, followed by the Internet 38.19% (n=110) and various types of educational books 28.47% (n=82). Only about 20.13% (n=58) of them received appropriate pieces of advice from general practitioners or paediatricians (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

This study explored mothers’ knowledge and attitude, regarding ECC, and barriers to dental therapy in Taif (one of the largest cities in 21the western region of Saudi Arabia, containing several administrative regions). The focus of this study was on the central district, which is the city of Taif. In this study, housewives represented 56.59% (n=163) of the study population. Goyal J et al., found that mothers who are heavily involved in housework may have less time and energy to prioritise oral care practices for their children, leading to higher rates of dental caries (13).

Most of the mothers in this study (about 60%) had received a higher education, and this may suggest good knowledge about the dental health of their children. Numerous studies have shown that there is a positive association between higher levels of maternal education and better oral health outcomes for children (3),(11),(14),(15).

Majority of the mothers 77.08% (n=222) understood that tooth decay is the most common chronic childhood disease among children under seven years of age, and almost all the mothers 94.79% (n=273) agreed that a child’s teeth are as important as an adult’s teeth. A 70.13% (n=202) of the surveyed mothers reported that their children had impaired sleep because of their tooth decay. This observation is supported by most of the literature, which emphasises that children suffering from dental caries have disrupted sleep patterns. This also indicates the substantial influence of tooth decay on the wellbeing and quality of life of children. It is clear that dental caries affects not only children’s physical health, but that it also has a deep impact on the overall wellbeing and quality of life of the child (6),(16),(17),(18),(19).

More than half of the mothers in the study 57.63% (n=166) understood the relation between poor dental health and hygiene and a child’s ability to learn. This could reflect adequate knowledge in the mothers about the fact that poor dental health can lead to pain and discomfort, leading to distractions and difficulty focusing in the classroom. Additionally, poor dental health can cause chronic pain and discomfort, making it difficult for children to concentrate on and participate in school activities (16),(20),(21). A 20.13% (n=58) of the mothers in this study, on the other hand, didn’t know whether poor dental health could impair a child’s ability to learn. This demonstrated the importance of supporting mothers’ understanding and knowledge of dental health by implementing comprehensive strategies to improve their knowledge and awareness (16),(21),(22).

When asked about breastfeeding and its relation to dental caries, 59.72% (n=172) of the mothers believed there to be no relation between the two. Only 20.83% (n=60) felt there was a relation. Despite the prevailing belief among mothers that breastfeeding does not cause dental caries, conflicting evidence from various studies suggests that prolonged and nocturnal breastfeeding may increase the risk of dental caries in older children (23). The vast majority of mothers, accounting for 88.19% (n=254), were aware that a child’s toothbrush should be replaced every three months. A 78.12% (n=225) of the mothers didn’t take much care of their children’s baby teeth, “because they will fall out”. This may indicate weak knowledge about dental health.

In this study, about 28.81% (n=83) of the mothers didn’t know that a child’s first dental appointment should take place during the first year of life, and similar findings have indeed been noted in study in Jordan by BaniHani A et al., (2021) and Al-Shalan TA et al., 2002 in Saudi Arabia as well as in USA the study of Hashim Nainar SM and Straffon LH 2003 (4),(24),(25).

In this research, 74.65% (n=215) of the mothers were aware that they should take their children to a dentist twice a year, regardless of the presence of pain or infection. This can be attributed to a higher education level and family income. More than two thirds of the mothers 77.77% (n=224) revealed that they helped their children with brushing their teeth. According to the literature, it has been shown that children have better oral hygiene when their mothers participate in regular oral hygiene maintenance and are encouraged to adopt good verbal health behaviours (8),(26). Petersen PE and Farid H et al., have examined how maternal characteristics, such as education and behaviour, influence the oral health of their children (22),(27).

Socio-economic barriers could contribute to the underutilisation of dental care services. Therefore, when evaluating the overall oral health of individuals and communities, it is crucial to take into account the connection between household income and access to dental care. In this study, the families predominantly had a middle to high income (38.88%- n=112 and 21.18%- n=61, respectively), and about 64.23% (n=185) of the families had dental insurance. The accessibility of high-quality dental care is greatly influenced by income levels.

Additionally, studies have indicated that children from low-income households are less likely to receive preventive dental care, resulting in a higher prevalence of dental problems and overall poorer oral health outcomes (14),(28). Even though most of the families in this study had a middle to high income, about quarter of the mothers 23.95% (n=69) indicated that their children did not see a dentist. However, 90.62% (n=261) of the mothers had a dental center no further than one hour away from their residence. Indeed, there is evidence suggesting that socio-economic factors alone may not be the sole determinant of limited utilisation of dental care services among children (4),(27),(29). While studies by Amiresmaili M et al., in Iran, Farid H et al., in Pakistan, Vasireddy D et al., in USA and AlAnouti F et al., in the UAE have shown a correlation between low-income households and restricted access to preventive dental care, it is crucial to consider other potential contributing factors (14),(27),(28),(29). Barriers such as work commitments, transportation challenges, and childcare arrangements can impede individuals from scheduling dental appointments, regardless of their income level. Thus, future research should investigate these additional barriers and their influence on oral health outcomes for developing more comprehensive strategies to enhance access to dental care services for all children.

Despite the fact there are effective, low-cost strategies for preventing dental caries in this vulnerable population, the adverse effects of dental caries remain concerning. Therefore, the healthcare provider’s first duty should be to inform caregivers about effective, low-cost preventive methods for children’s oral care, because it is recommended that parents instill in their children a lifelong commitment to proper dental hygiene practices at the beginning of infancy (30). The best way to teach parents how to care for their children’s teeth at home is to provide them with information such as how often they should brush their children’s teeth, how much toothpaste they should use when they should brush their children’s teeth, when to discuss the importance of healthy eating, and when to seek professional dental care (30),(31),(32). The data presented in this study may be useful in evaluating prior initiatives and establishing future initiatives to prevent and treat oral-related issues in young children, as well as in the creation and execution of long-term oral health awareness programs for mothers.

Limitation(s)

It’s critical to recognise some of the report’s limitations. The nature of this study was observational, meaning it can identify correlations but not causes. The study may not accurately reflect larger populations, because it was limited to a particular geographic area. The study used parents’ self-reported data, which raises the possibility of response bias. The study did not take into account additional confounding variables like dietary practices and systemic diseases that may have an impact on oral health.

Conclusion

It has been noted that while there was awareness about the different aspects of oral health and dental caries among the study sample, several mothers exhibited unfavorable attitudes toward oral health practices, which could set a negative example for their children. This suggests that their ability to convert their knowledge into habits was lacking.

Larger and more varied sample sizes and longitudinal research designs are required to validate these results and investigate probable causative links. An additional qualitative study exploring mothers’ knowledge and understanding of the importance of their children’s oral health may be recommended, given that this is an investigational study with increased risk of bias, as the questionnaire was answered by mothers with differing levels of knowledge. In addition, there is a need for a qualitative study to probe more about this relationship and investigate more about the obstacles standing in the way of regular dental treatment. This will probably increase awareness of the importance of young children visiting the dentist.

References

1.
Abduljalil HS, Abuaffan AH. Knowledge and practice of mothers in relation to dental health of pre-school children. Adv Genet Eng. 2016;5(2):01-07. [crossref]
2.
Wen PY, Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM. Global burden and inequality of dental caries, 1990 to 2019. J Dent Res. 2022;101(4):392-99. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Consequences and preventive strategies. The Reference Manual of Paediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry; 2020:79-81. https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/p_eccconsequences.pdf.
4.
BaniHani A, Tahmassebi J, Zawaideh F. Maternal knowledge on early childhood caries and barriers to seek dental treatment in Jordan. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(3):433-39. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Kumarihamy SL, Subasinghe LD, Jayasekara P, Kularatna SM, Palipana PD. The prevalence of Early Childhood Caries in 1-2 yrs olds in a semi-urban area of Sri Lanka. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4(1):01-06. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Krisdapong S, Somkotra T, Kueakulpipat W. Disparities in early childhood caries and its impact on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014;26(3):285-94. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on the dental home. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(7 Suppl):18-19.
8.
Nourijelyani K, Yekaninejad MS, Eshraghian MR, Mohammad K, Foroushani AR, Pakpour A. The influence of mothers’ lifestyle and health behaviour on their children: An exploration for oral health. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(2):e16051. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Al-Zahrani AM, Al-Mushayt AS, Otaibi MF, Wyne AH. Knowledge and attitude of Saudi mothers towards their preschool children’s oral health. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):720-24. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Taha SG, Hegazy SA, Saleh RI. Maternal knowledge, attitude and possible risk factors of early childhood caries among preschool children in Mansoura city. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry. 2021;8(4):31-35. [crossref]
11.
Luz PB, Pereira JT, Knorst JK, Bonfadini I, Piva F, Scapinello M, et al. The role of mother’s knowledge, attitudes, practices in dental caries on vulnerably preschool children. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2020;20:01-10. https://www.scielo.br/j/pboci/a/PFYMXrPs9nMPCmGxyw58crH/?format=pdf&lang=en. [crossref]
12.
Dagon N, Ratson T, Peretz B, Blumer S. Maternal knowledge of oral health of children aged 1-4 years. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(2):116-20. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Goyal J, Menon I, Singh RP, Sharma A, Passi D, Bhagia P. Association between maternal dental anxiety and its effect on the oral health status of their child: An institutional cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(2): 535-38. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Amiresmaili M, Amini S, Shahravan A, Goudarzi R, Anari SH, Anbari Z, et al. Relation between socioeconomic indicators and children dental caries in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106133/. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Chouchene F, Masmoudi F, Baaziz A, Maatouk F, Ghedira H. Early childhood caries prevalence and associated risk factors in Monastir, Tunisia: A cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:821128. Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.821128. eCollection 2022. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Abed R, Bernabe E, Sabbah W. Family impacts of severe dental caries among children in the United Kingdom. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):109. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Pakkhesal M, Riyahi E, Naghavi Alhosseini A, Amdjadi P, Behnampour N. Impact of dental caries on oral health related quality of life among preschool children: Perceptions of parents. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(68):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Moro J, Santos P, Giacomin A, Cardoso M, Bolan M. Association between trouble sleeping and oral conditions among schoolchildren. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021;39:01-07. https://www.scielo.br/j/rpp/a/6G4T6pzHvCsQKckxR7KwkYz/?lang=en. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Zaror C, Matamala-Santander A, Ferrer M, Rivera-Mendoza F, Espinoza-Espinoza G, Martínez-Zapata MJ. Impact of early childhood caries on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2022;20(1):120-35. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Alkhtib AO, Mohamed HG. Current knowledge about early childhood caries in the gulf cooperation council with worldwide reflection: Scoping review of the scientific literature (2010-2021). PLOS Global Public Health. 2023;3(1):e0001228. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Quadri MF, Jaafari FR, Mathmi NA, Huraysi NH, Nayeem M, Jessani A, et al. impact of the poor oral health status of children on their families: An analytical cross-sectional study. Children. 2021;8(7):586.[crossref][PubMed]
22.
Petersen PE. Priorities for research for oral health in the 21 st Century-the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Health. 2005;22(2):71-74. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Tham R, Bowatte G, Dharmage SC, Tan DJ, Lau MX, Dai X, et al. Breastfeeding and the risk of dental caries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica. 2015;104(S467):62-84. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Al-Shalan TA, Al-Musa BA, Al-Khamis AM. Parents’ attitude towards children’s first dental visit in the college of dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2002;23(9):1110-14.
25.
Hashim Nainar SM, Straffon LH. Targeting of the year one dental visit for United States children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003;13(4):258-63. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Chand S, Chand S, Dhanker K, Chaudhary A. Impact of mothers’ oral hygiene knowledge and practice on oral hygiene status of their 12-year-old children: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry. 2014;12(4):323-29. [crossref]
27.
Farid H, Khan FR, Aman N. Knowledge, attitude and practice of mothers regarding their own and children’s dental health-a tertiary care hospital based study. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2013;25(3-4):35-37.
28.
Vasireddy D, Sathiyakumar T, Mondal S, Sur S. Socioeconomic factors associated with the risk and prevalence of dental caries and dental treatment trends in children: A cross-sectional analysis of National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) Data, 2016-2019. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19184. [crossref]
29.
Al Anouti F, Abboud M, Papandreou D, Haidar S, Mahboub N, Rizk R. Oral health of children and adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A systematic review of the past decade. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2021;2:744328. Doi: 10.3389/ froh.2021.744328. eCollection 2021. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Koh HK, Berwick DM, Clancy CM, Baur C, Brach C, Harris LM, et al. New federal policy initiatives to boost health literacy can help the nation move beyond the cycle of costly ‘crisis care’. Health Affairs. 2012;31(2):434-43. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Suprabha BS, D’Souza V, Shenoy R, Karuna YM, Nayak AP, Rao A. Early childhood caries and parents’ challenges in implementing oral hygiene practices: A qualitative study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(1):106-14. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Dudovitz R, Teutsch C, Holt K, Herman A. Improving parent oral health literacy in Head Start programs. J Public Health Dent. 2020;80(2):150-58.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67869.18891

Date of Submission: Oct 04, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 12, 2023 (8%)

Etymology: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com